LIQUIDOW
TM
CONTROL COSTS WHILE CONTROLLING DUST
DUST: LITTLE PARTICLES, BIG PROBLEMS
AN INTRODUCTION TO DUST ECONOMICS
Perhaps your budget has been cut recently, or you just don’t think you can
afford a dust control program right now. Well, the best possible program - one
that features LIQUIDOW* 38% Liquid Calcium Chloride - can actually pay for
itself, by reducing the amount of aggregate your unpaved roads lose each year.
Hard to believe? Consider these numbers.
Users of LIQUIDOW 38% Liquid Calcium Chloride report a reduction in lost
aggregate of up to 75-80%. To put this in some perspective: if the average
untreated, unpaved road loses 300 tons of aggregate per mile per year, the
average road treated with liquid calcium chloride will lose only 60 tons. Now,
to replace that 60 tons of aggregate, a 15 ton truck would require only four
delivery runs - as opposed to the 20 runs required to replace the untreated
road’s 300 tons of lost aggregate. This translates into substantial savings,
in terms of both lost aggregate and the labor required to replace it. In fact,
users of LIQUIDOW report a 30-33% reduction in total unpaved road maintenance
costs.
OTHER ECONOMIC FACTORS TO CONSIDER
HOW LIQUIDOW DOES IT - LIQUIDOW 38%
Controlling dust helps you control costs in other ways as well. For example,
buildings located near unpaved surfaces may become less expensive to clean and
maintain. Your vehicle maintenance costs can also be reduced. After all, tiny
dust particles are quite capable of eluding preventive measures such as
filters, plastic covers and cleansers. This leads to damaged bearings, clogged
carburetors, fouled plugs and points, and ultimately, premature engine failure.
So in an era of tightening budgets, a preventative dust control program
featuring LIQUIDOW 38% Liquid Calcium Chloride is more, not less, important. It
practically always pays for itself.
AND MUCH MORE
Calcium chloride also exhibits a strong moisture film, high surface tension and
low vapor pressure. These characteristics and calcium chloride’s
"thirst" for moisture help bind aggregate particles together. As a
result, the unpaved surfaces become compact. And over time, the chemical
penetrates the surface at a depth of several inches, adding a stabilizing
effect. This is what accounts for the reduction in lost aggregate discussed
earlier and for LIQUIDOW 38% Liquid Calcium Chloride’s superiority as a dust
control agent.
LIQUIDOW VS. OTHER DUST CONTROL AGENTS: A CLEAN SWEEP
Over the years, many different materials have been tried in the effort to
control dust. Yet in test after test, none has proven as effective as calcium
chloride, which explains why it is most preferred by road officials.
OILS AND EMULSIONS - Aside from the fact that they usually cost more than calcium chloride - up to 6 times as much, according to a Harvard University Study - oils and emulsions (mixtures of oil and water) are sloppy. They stick to shoes, clothes and cars; get tracked into buildings; and choke roadside foliage.
LIGNIN SULFONATE
-
This byproduct of paper mills is a gummy substance that coats unpaved surfaces
like emulsions do. And like emulsions, it offers few, if any, stabilizing
benefits.
Other drawbacks include local supply problems, a foul odor and a tendency to
become slippery when wet. In addition, a field test performed in 1983 by the
U.S. Bureau of Mines showed lignin sulfonate to be nearly one and a half times
more expensive than liquid calcium chloride to achieve a 50% level of
effectiveness.
SURFACTANTS - These soap-like substances have generally proven ineffective because they evaporate too quickly. In fact, they failed the Bureau of Mines tests altogether .
WATER - Water evaporates too quickly to make it even worthy of consideration as a dust control agent, a fact which is backed by virtually every study ever conducted on dust suppressants.MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE
- Calcium chloride and magnesium chloride may cost about the same to buy, but not to use. That’s because magnesium chloride is considerably less efficient - suppliers recommend that up to twice as much of it should be applied. And a study conducted by the Institute of Road Building, Royal Technological College, Stockholm, Sweden, concluded that 18% more magnesium chloride is required to control dust as effectively as calcium chloride .The reason more magnesium chloride is needed is that it begins to lose its moisture attraction and retention capabilities at temperatures above 71ºF and relative humidity’s below 31% - conditions that could hardly be called uncommon. Also, because magnesium chloride is produced by solar evaporation, its concentrations can vary widely and, therefore, so can its performance. Calcium chloride, on the other hand, is processed under strict quality control conditions. This assures that what you order is precisely what you get.
THE FINAL ANALYSIS*Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company